<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>ProDevTips - Latest Comments in Extending Zend DB Table</title><link>http://prodevtips.disqus.com/</link><description>Mainly tutorials and tips relating to web development with PHP, Javascript, jQuery and Ruby</description><atom:link href="https://prodevtips.disqus.com/extending_zend_db_table/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:29:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Extending Zend DB Table</title><link>http://www.prodevtips.com/2008/06/19/extending-zend-db-table/#comment-1494414</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I just checked find(), seems like it will always return a rowset whereas fetchOne will return a row or even a 1d array, depending on the arguments, hence the shortcut is still somewhat valid.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henrik</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:29:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Extending Zend DB Table</title><link>http://www.prodevtips.com/2008/06/19/extending-zend-db-table/#comment-1494413</link><description>&lt;p&gt;1.) Too lazy at the moment.&lt;br&gt;2.) Thanks for the tip, I think I've actually used the find() function before, shows how good my memory is...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henrik</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:38:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Extending Zend DB Table</title><link>http://www.prodevtips.com/2008/06/19/extending-zend-db-table/#comment-1494412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello!&lt;br&gt;Why you are not using encapsulation (private/public/protected)?&lt;br&gt;Your method fetchOne() dublicated method Zend_Db_Table_Abstract::find().&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for good tips ))&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Serkys</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:59:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>