<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>ProDevTips - Latest Comments in jQuery tablesorter - sorting tables is easy</title><link>http://prodevtips.disqus.com/</link><description>Mainly tutorials and tips relating to web development with PHP, Javascript, jQuery and Ruby</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 03:11:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: jQuery tablesorter - sorting tables is easy</title><link>http://www.prodevtips.com/2007/12/11/jquery-tablesorter-sorting-tables-is-easy/#comment-2438421</link><description>thanks i search for this code over all the web, and finnaly found it her.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kamal</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 03:11:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: jQuery tablesorter - sorting tables is easy</title><link>http://www.prodevtips.com/2007/12/11/jquery-tablesorter-sorting-tables-is-easy/#comment-1494293</link><description>The difference is that when I used dimensions I get a small margin to the top of the window from the element scrolled to. This might or might not be a bug in dimensions or my specific usage or something. I'm probably stupid for relying on this quirk if it is a bug. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway with the prior version of scrollto I was correctly scrolled to the top of the window, I'll play around with the new version of your scrollto and see what I can do. I'll also get some demo up when I get the time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the tips and the new version!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prodevtips</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:17:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: jQuery tablesorter - sorting tables is easy</title><link>http://www.prodevtips.com/2007/12/11/jquery-tablesorter-sorting-tables-is-easy/#comment-1494294</link><description>I'm curious about the difference you mention when using dimensions.&lt;br&gt;The plugin dimensions, slightly improves jQuery's function 'offset()' which is used by 'position()', tough I didn't saw any difference for now (in the new demo). What I mentioned before, about the option 'offset' being $().height() / 2, should be -$().height()/2. Note the '-'. Might that be the difference ?. You could also play with the option 'margin'. Try setting it to true, maybe that fixes it.&lt;br&gt;Lastly, on the last release, I allowed some overloading, and you can replace:&lt;br&gt;$.scrollTo( '....', {speed:500}); for  $.scrollTo( '....', 500 );&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well... hope that helps ;)&lt;br&gt;Cheers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ariel Flesler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:06:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: jQuery tablesorter - sorting tables is easy</title><link>http://www.prodevtips.com/2007/12/11/jquery-tablesorter-sorting-tables-is-easy/#comment-1494292</link><description>Coming up, in due time I will post the finished result. I'm currently using the Google reader but it lacks some functionality which I want and since I'm doing my own feed reader as a web app I will put it up &lt;a href="http://www.prodevtips.com/the-host/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; when it's finished. I'm too lazy to setup unfinished versions, be patient and &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/prodevtips/LVkG" rel="nofollow"&gt;subscribe&lt;/a&gt; and you won't miss out on anything.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prodevtips</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:43:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: jQuery tablesorter - sorting tables is easy</title><link>http://www.prodevtips.com/2007/12/11/jquery-tablesorter-sorting-tables-is-easy/#comment-1494291</link><description>Where's the demo?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">455</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:28:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>